Hemp manufacturers and retailers in Texas filed a lawsuit on Wednesday, challenging the Texas health department on its recently enacted ban on selling smokable hemp products.

Four businesses filed the lawsuit in a Travis County court against the Texas Department of State Health Services and its commissioner John Hellerstedt.

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that the department’s ban on processing and manufacturing hemp products for smoking in Texas is unconstitutional, and that the provision banning the distribution and retail sale of hemp products is invalid, according to Chelsie Spencer, principal of Ritter Spencer PLLC in Dallas, who is representing Crown Distributing, one of the lawsuit plaintiffs.

The ban on smokable hemp distribution and sales took effect Sunday.

The other business involved in the legal action are:

  • Hemp product manufacturer and distributor America Juice Co.
  • Hemp retailer Custom Botanical Dispensary
  • Hemp product manufacturer 1937 Apothecary

The lawsuit aims to prevent the Texas DSHS and its commissioner from enforcing the statewide bans on the manufacturing, processing, distribution and retail sale of smokable hemp products.

The hemp law signed by Gov. Greg Abbott last summer to establish a hemp program in the state included prohibitive language outlawing some aspects of smokable hemp.

But while the original legislation required DSHS to adopt rules prohibiting Texas hemp businesses from processing and manufacturing smokable hemp products, the lawsuit blames the state health department for “doubling down” by also banning distribution and retail of smokable hemp. That move, the plaintiffs claim, exceeds the authority of the DSHS and violates the state law.

The smokable hemp ban does not restrict consumers from using smokable hemp products, although it bars the state’s entrepreneurs from profiting from a lucrative aspect of the hemp industry, Texas hemp insiders say.

The lawsuit argues that the ban restricts the fledgling hemp industry in Texas from participating in “one of the fastest growing hemp sub-markets nationwide – growing at a rate of more than 500% between 2018 and 2019.”

Members of the Texas Hemp Growers raised $15,000 for the Texas Hemp Legal Defense Fund to aid the plaintiffs in their suit against the state.

“This ban is a punitive kick in the teeth to Texas’ small businesses and enterprising farmers,” said Zachary Maxwell, president of Texas Hemp Growers in a statement.

“Texas will forfeit millions in tax revenue to more competitive states by denying the industry full access to this federally legal plant.”

The lawsuit argues the state’s ban on smokable hemp products will shutter businesses, resulting in a loss of jobs and tax revenue, and “pose an existential threat to Texas hemp manufacturers, farmers and retailers,” while driving business elsewhere.

“Based on projections by our economic expert, Crown stands to lose over $56.4 million dollars in revenue over the next five years if the ban remain in place. Texas stands to lose $2.9 million dollars in sales tax alone,” Spenser wrote on LinkedIn on Thursday.

The rule banning the retail sale and distribution of smokable hemp products was approved and went into effect despite thousands of industry members expressing opposition to the measure over the summer.

In June, the Texas Hemp Industries Association asked the state health department to change the proposed rule banning smokable hemp sales, saying it goes beyond state and federal statutes, is an unfunded mandate and is unenforceable.

The Texas lawsuit follows similar action from a group of Indiana hemp companies that challenged the state’s law banning smokable hemp products.

The Indiana hemp companies argued that federal law guarantees interstate commerce in hemp, making it impossible for Indiana to ban the possession of smokable hemp products potentially passing through the state. A federal judge in Indiana sided with the hemp companies last September, putting an injunction on the law.

But Indiana’s law came back to life last month, after a federal appeals court ruled that a lower judge went too far in blocking it.

Laura Drotleff can be reached at [email protected]

Visits: 276